(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.73 Contents)


Materials and Methods

Failures in yield in some years are often correlated with severe fusarium head blight (Maric et al 1986). How high these damages really are and what their maximum is in our wheat growing areas is hard to determine for sure without exact field testing. Therefore, adequate field trials were conducted at location Botinec, with five wheat lines all developed by this Institute. The aim was to determine the effect of fusarium head blight on reduction in yield. Severe attack (epiphytotic) of the fungus was ensured by artificial infection with a population of selected Fusarium graminearum isolates.

Experiments were set following split-plot design in randomized blocks with five replications. Plot size was 1
m2. Artificial infection was made with a suspension of spores from selected Fusarium graminearum isolates at the flowering stage (stage 10.5 after the Feekes-Large), late in the afternoon, thus avoiding high daily temperature, while requirements in high relative air humidity needed or germination, of spore were met, which ensured a successful infection. Apart from the fact that evening dew provides optimal conditions for the infection, artificial infection late in the afternoon allowed us to avoid plastic foil often recommended and used by many authors in their research. For the area where our research was conducted, northwestern Croatia, use of plastic foil is limited because of the high daily temperatures occurring during anthesis. This was proved in our trials when plants, covered with plastic foil immediately after the inoculation died because of extremely high temperatures occurring under the foil.

Identification of Fusarium species, collected from infected samples of spike, isolation of pure culture of Fusarium graminearum fungus used for artificial infection, and selection of the most suitable isolates for preparation of inoculum was made by Viktorija Vlahovic, M. Sc. in a laboratory of this Institute, following the well-known methods (Milatovic, Vlahovic and Tomasovic, 1982; Bekele 1984; Liu 1984; Luzzardi 1984).

Severity of fusarium head blight attack was rated by an international scale (Tomasovic 1987) at the milk- dough stage (stage 11.1 and 11.2, Feekes-Large). Other details referring to the mentioned rating scale are discussed in paper by Tomasovic (1987) and Milatovic, Vlahovic and Tomasovic (1982). Other management practices usual for trials of such type and purpose were applied. In both years of research trials were treated for weed control.


Results and Discussion

After adequate statistical data processing, analysis of variance showed that both tested factors, artificial infection and variety, as well as their interaction did not always have statistically significant effect on yield in both years (
Table 1). From those two factors, only artificial infection had a statistically significant effect on yield in both years. The significance of this effect was demonstrated in "F" and "t" tests. Thus, reduction in yield in 1985 ranged from 53 to 70% and in 1986 from 51 to 53%. Such severe reductions in yield because of the disease should not only be attributed to artificial infection, but also to actual climatic conditions that favoured the occurrence and development of the disease. This especially refers to the second year of investigation (1986) when moderately severe attack of natural fusarium head blight was observed, which, of course, reflected on percentage of total yield loss in that year. In this way, yield reduction was seemingly lower, though one would not tell that judging by the climatic conditions. Therefore, in presenting data, estimates of fusarium head blight attack both from natural conditions and artificial infection have to be given. Naturally, disease attack must be rated by an accepted international scale and within optimal therm, so that the obtained results can be compared with the results already obtained both in this country and from worldwide.

<--Back |-->Next

(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.73 Contents)