(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.60 Contents)



Results and Discussion

At metaphase I control plants regularly formed 21 bivalents characteristic of diploid-like pairing reported inthis species (RILEY 1974). Microsporocytes with ring bivalents were in greater frequency than rod bivalents in all the genotypes. Anaphase I in control plants revealed normal segregation of 21 : 21 chromosomes on both the poles.

The cytological data (Fig.1) indicate that all the genotypes displayed a regular trend for the increase in the frequency of aberrations with every increase in the EMS dose. It is evident from Fig.1 that EMS treatment of 0.6 percent at all the durations in all the genotypes produced maximum aberrations ranging from 4.52 percent (Al-Samma) to 13.81 percent (Maaya). Similar relationship between dose and chromoromal aberrations was reported by several workers (SEARS 1957 ; MATSUMURA 1961 ; LARIK 1975 ; LARIK et al. 1981, 1982). Multivalents ranged from trivalents to quadrivalents. Although not consistent there was a tendency for increased frequency of multivalents with increasing doses of EMS. A marked differences in the frequency of multivalents was apparent between treatments within the same genotype. A high incidence of ring bivalents in wheat may be attributed to the large size of the chromosomes ; presumably large segments of chromosomes were involved in interchanges. The data have also suggested that there were genotypic differences in the frequency of occurrence of EMS-induced multivalents. Variety Maaya displayed maximum frequency of multivalents whereas, variety Al-Samma showed minimum frequency of multivalents. In few cases chromosomes at MI appeared to be clumped. This can be attributed to the straight and narrow nature of the spindle (LARIK et al. 1981).

Anaphase I and later stages were accompanied by various types of anomalies. Anaphase bridges appeared in various configurations, the most common being sticky bridges and bridges due to delayed separation of chromosomes. The occurrence of various forms of anaphase bridges suggest that their formation depends upon the event of crossing over, which occurs regularly at meiosis. The delayed separation of some chromosome associations was probably due to delayed chiasma terminalization. However, REES & THOMPSON (1955) and LEWIS & JOHN (1966) have shown that similar configuration could arise from spontaneous breakages.

The univalents accumulated in the equatorial region during MI become the lagging chromosomes at AI in PMC's. This was reported by several workers (KIHARA 1930 ; LARIK et al. 1981,1982) and is also confirmed by the prresent study. In few cases at AI a 20 : 22 chromosome disjunction was observed. If the unbalanced gametes are functional as has been reported by SEARS (1954) in Triticum aestivum and LARIK (1978 a, b 1981) in Avena sativa, it may be possible to build up an array of aneuploids, which might be helpful in genetic study of our wheat cultivars.

Pollen fertility, as judged by stainability decrease with the increase of duration of EMS dose (Fig.1). Similar results were reported by GAUL (1964). Low fertility may be ascribed at least partly due to irregular disjunction of chromosomes at anaphase resulting from the formation of interchange multivalents. On the contrary, the production of gametes with duplications and deficiencies for a certain chromosome sections add to pollen sterility. While recognising the role of meiotic anomalies in causing sterility, the role of genetic factors affecting meiosis cannot be ruled out in this polyploid. Orientation of chromosomes at MI is another factor influencing sterility (KUMAR & DAS 1973). Crossing over in the interstitial segments also affects sterility (RANA 1965).

The difference in chiasma frequency between varieties and interactions in treated populations were highly significant (Table 1). The continuous nature of the variation in chiasma frequency among genotypes, expressed by the Fig. 1, indicate that formation of chiasmata is controlled by polygenes and it has a profound effect on the distribution of the various chromosome configurations at meiosis (LARIK et al. 1982).



<-- Back

|

--> Next


(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.60 Contents)