(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.85 Contents)


When Rht1 Rht2 (Rht1 Rht1 Rht2 Rht2) NILs were compared to rht1 rht2 NILs, this genotype significantly enhanced grain yield (22%) and harvest index (27%) but was neutral for kernels/ spike and spike number, while reducing test weight and kernel weight. These results were in agreement with the earlier study for test weight and kernel weight. In the earlier test, the Rht1 Rht2 genotype generally enhanced spike number and kernels/spike but caused inconsistent effects on grain yield (Allan 1989).

Lodging was inversely related to plant height (
Table 1). Higher yields of the three semidwarf genotypes over the nonsemidwarf genotype were only partly due to their superior lodging resistance. The percentage yield increase of semidwarf NILs compared to nonsemidwarf NILs in tests sustaining significant versus minor lodging were: Rht1 NILs (45 versus 30%), Rht2 NILs (33 versus 24%) and Rht1 Rht2 NILs (24 versus 21%), respectively.

These results may explain the exceptional performance of Nugaines in the PNW of USA. Background genes of Nugaines appear to be especially compatible with Rht1 or Rht2 genes allowing for maximum grain yield increase. Furthermore, the Rht2 gene does not reduce test weight in the Nugaines background whereas it has consistently reduced test weights in all other genetic backgrounds. Nugaines was a sib of Gaines and was released to replace Gaines because it had higher test weight and flour yield.

The grain yield superiority of Rht1 compared to Rht2 was unexpected since Nugaines contributed the Rht2 allele while Chugoku 81 contributed the Rht1 allele. One explanation could be that favorable yield genes of Chugoku 81 remained linked to Rht1 when backcrossed to Nugaines. That Rht1 Rht2 NILs had unusually high mean grain yields which were comparable (P>0.05) to Rht2 NILs supports this possibility. O.A. Vogel selected Nugaines from a cross of Sel 14/50-3 and Burt. Sel 14/50-3 had the Rht2 gene while Burt had neither semidwarf gene. Hence there was no possibility of obtaining selections with Rht1 from the cross that produced Nugaines.


References

Allan RE (1989) Agronomic comparisons between Rht1 and Rht2 semidwarf genes in winter wheat. Crop Sci
29:1103-1108.

Dalrymple DG(1980) Development and spread of semi-dwaf varieties of wheat and rice in the United States.

USDA-0ICD in Coop. with U.S. Agency for Int. Devel. Agric. Economic Rpt. No 455. US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.

Patterson FL and Allan RE (1981) Soft wheat breeding in the United States. In: Yamazaki WT and Greenwood CT (eds) Soft Wheat: Production, breeding, milling and uses. Am Assoc Cereal Chemists Inc, St. Paul, MN 33-98.

Vogel OA (1964) Registration of Gaines wheat. Crop Sci 4: 116-117.

Vogel OA and Peterson CJ Jr. (1974) Registration of Nugaines wheat. Crop Sci 14: 609.

<--Back

(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.85 Contents)