(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.73 Contents)


Wheat Information Service
Number 73: 5-7 (1991)


Identification of souces of resistance against flag smut (Urocystis agropyri (Preuss) Schroet) of wheat

G. C. Bhatnagar, S. N. Mali and V. K. Bhatnagar

Wheat Improvement Project, Agriculture Research Station, Durgapura, Jaipur - 302 018, India


Hitherto the flag smut of wheat caused by Urocystis agropyri (Preuss) Schroet was considered to be of minor importance in the country. However, in recent past it has been reported in damaging proportions from many parts of the country. The disease was first reported in 1906 by Butler from Layalpur (Punjab) and its sporadic reports are on record from to time. The disease has now become one of the yield reducing factors in Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. Even some of the present day cultivars have developed susceptibility and the incidence of the disease has been on increase in these states (Butler 1918; Mundkur 1944; Rao 1952; Bedi 1957; Kothari and Dange 1968; Sethi and Singh 1971 and Bhatnagar and Vijaylaxmi 1975). The situation with respect to Flag smut incidence in Rajasthan during the past five years is more alarming as the losses to the extent of 40-60% have been reported from different parts of the state (Bhatnagar et al 1978). Besides, studies on loss estimation, control through cultural practices and chemicals, studies on varietal susceptibility and screening of promising breeding material at different stages of its development were conducted to identify resistant donars so as to make wheat breeding programme more meaningful.


Materials and Methods

A sick plot (2500 m2) was developed at Agricultural Research Station, Durgapura. The inoculum load in the sick plot was so much that the susceptible varieties exhibited 100% infection. The topography of the infected area was uniform. However, additional inoculum was supplemented through seed and soil at the time of sowing to put maximum selection pressure of the pathogen. Each cultivar was planted in 2 m rows at 5 cm depth with three controls (Lal Bahadur, HD 2009 and D-134) of highly susceptible varieties after every tenth row. The planted material was grown under normal optimum conditions of fertility, irrigation and other cultural practices recommended for wheat crop in this agro-climatic zone. The incidence of flag smut was recorded on individual plants at flag leaf stage, and per cent infection was calculated by formula:

(Number of infected plants / Total number of plants) X 100


Besides the available commercial varieties, the entries in plant pathological screening nursery including IET and U. R. T material were subjected to testing. The cultivars or varieties exhibiting less than one per cent infection have been categorised as resistant.

-->Next

(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.73 Contents)