(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.73 Contents)


Results and Discussion

The values in
Table 1 reveal that plants in 17 monosomic F2 populations segregated into different types whereas in disomic F2 cross there was no segregation. This difference in awning seemed to be controlled by factors located on at least seventeen chromosomes. Similar situation was observed in the report on tetraploid wheat Khapli by Mokhtarzadeh (1975) where he explained that awning is controlled by factors located on nine chromosomes. Similar type of explanation was given to describe the inheritance of glume colour in Red Bobs (Sadananda, 1977), in Cadet (Bhowal and Jha, 1969) and in Khapli (Mokhtazadeh, 1975).

This indicates that there is a complex interaction among genes present on these seventeen chromosomes with the genotype of the male gamete when the genes are present in hemizygous condition (single dose). This is the reason why segregation was not observed in four populations where these seventeen chromosomes are present in homozygous condition. Depending on the type of interaction the gene is engaged in, the ultimate rations in the critical families are bound to vary. That is why the segration ratio differed among the critical families or it may be due to the modifying factors, which affect the expression of main factors, A, B and Hd (Clark, 1926).

For waxiness also, segregation into waxy and nonwaxy was not observed in disomic, F2 population (
Table 2). But seventeen monosomic populations showed segregation, the remaining four viz., 4A, 6A, 5D and 7D did not, thus, indicating the presence of genes for waxiness on these seventeen chromosomes and simultaneous absence of segregation for the two characters, i.e., waxiness and awnedness in four populations. From this we can infer that these two genes affecting awnedness and waxiness are closely associated or may be that there is pleiotropic effect of the concerned genes on these two characters.


References

Bhowal JG and Jha MP (1969) An inhibitor of glume pigment in wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 11: 226.

Clark JA (1926) Segregation and correlated inheritance in Marquis and Hard Federation Crosses, with factors for yield and quality of spring wheat in Montana. U. S. Dept Ag Bull 1403.

Heyne EG and Livers RW (1953) Monosomic analysis of leaf rust reaction, awnedness, winter injury and seed colour in Pawnee wheat. Agron J 45: 54-58.

Mokhtarzadh A (1975) Utilization of F1 monosomics for genetic analysis involving awn expression, glume colour, seed setting and seed abortion in crosses of tetraploid and hexaploid wheats. Theor Appl Genet 46: 1-5.

Sadananda AR (1977) Cytogenetic investigations of some morphological and grain characters in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ) using F2 monosomic analysis. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.

<--Back

(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.73 Contents)