(go to NO.61-62 Contents)



The spectrum of chlorophyll mutations show that some mutations like chlorina, tipxantha,viridis and xantha are found relatively in sufficient number after EMS treatment. It is known that in hexaploid wheat many traits are controlled by triplicate genes. The fact that none of the nullisomics of hexaploid wheat is deficient in chlorophyll suggests that the chlorophyll development in this plant is controlled by several unlinked genes (SWAMINATHAN et al. 1962 ; WASHINGTON & SEARS 1970). This means that the induction of high rates of chlorophyll mutations might have been a multimutational event, or simultaneous deletion of at least two different loci on homoeologous chromosomes, or some special phenomenon is involved due to specific action of the EMS. The experience in mutagenesis has shown the multimutations are frequently induced but are usually those involving the linked genes, or some cases pleiotropy may give an impression of multimutational event. Hence the possibility of simultaneous mutation of many unlinked genes or simultaneous deletion of different loci on homoeologous chromosomes though not totally excluded is a very rare event. In this context, it seems that some other phenomenon is involved in the induction of such mutations by EMS. One of the possibility is based upon the specificity of EMS to certain region of the chromosome i.e., those regions which are carriers of genes for chlorophyll development. SWAMINATHAN et al. (1962) pointed out to the randomness in the action of physical mutagens and the specificity of EMS to some loci in barley and wheat. They suggested that in the evolution of the gene placement along the chromosome arms, it is likely that linkage groups constituted of genes without need for recombination are located near centromere where linkage is tight and recombination is restricted. As such genes for chlorophyll development are located near centromeres and also in the proximal segments of the chromosomes. However, it is not practically confirmed that the genes for chlorophyll production are concentrated near centromeres and these blocks are more vulnerable to EMS action (WASHINGTON & SEARS 1970). Therefore, the specificity of EMS to chromosome regions with genes for chlorophyll development and the antimorphic action due to the alteration in the function of the gene, are the main causes of high rate and wide spectrum of chlorophyll mutations in EMS treatment.

A broader induced viable mutation spectrum observed in present study, affected almost all parts of the plants. Some viable beneficial mutations observed at different frequency are (i) dwarf mutants (ii) increased spike length mutants (iii) increased spikelets and seeds per spike mutants (iv) increase grain weight mutants and (v) early mutants. These beneficial mutations transferred from one generation to the next show a direct quantitative improvement over parental cultivars.

References

AASTVEIT, K. 1968. Mutation in Plant breeding, 11, FAO/IAEA, Vienna, 5-14.

LARIK, A.S. 1985. Wheat Infor. Serv. 61 (in press).

LARIK, A.S. & Y.A. AL-SAHEAL. 1986. Cytologia 51 (in press).

LARIK, A.S., H.M.I. HAFIZ & M.H.ARAIN. 1984. Genet. Agr. 38 : 35-42.

NILAN, R.A., A. KLEINHOAS & C.F. KONZAK. 1977. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 287 : 367-384.

SAHAMA RAO, H.K. & E.R. SEARS. 1964. Mutat. Res. 1 : 387-99.

SWAMINATHAN, M.S., V.L. CHOPRA, & S.B. BHASKARAN. 1962. Ind. J. Genet. Plant Breed. 22 : 19-207.

TIWARI, S.P. & N.S. SISODIA. 1981. J. Cytol. Genet. 16 : 141-150.

TSUKUDA, H., S. RUMIHIKO, T. SUSUMU & O. YOSHIRO. 1977. Sci. Rep. Fac. Agric. Ibarki Univ. 23 : 1- 6.

WASHINGTON, W.J. & E.R. SEARS. 1970. Can J Genet. Cytol. 12 : 851-859


<-- Back      

(go to NO.61-62 Contents)