(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.61-62 Contents)



I. Research Notes

Chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids in genus Aegilops

Patrick E. MCGUIRE

Dept. of Agronomy and Range Science University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA

The purpose of this report is to communicate the observed amounts of chromosome pairing at metaphase I (MI) in hybrids obtained from several combinations of species in the genus Aegilops. Some of these hybrid combinations are reported for the first time ; others have been reported previously but usually characterized only by ranges and modes of configurations instead of means.

Materials and Methods

Seed of the species used was obtained as indicated in Table 1 from the collections of the Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, England ; Dept. of Plant Science, University of California, Riverside, USA ; Agriculture Research Service, USDA, at the University of Missouri, Columbia, USA ; and the USDA at Beltsville, Maryland, USA.

All plants were maintained and crosses were made under greenhouse conditions. Embryos were excised 14 days after pollination and cultured aseptically until the two-leaf stage on a modified (DVORAK 1981) B5 medium. Spikes of hybrids were fixed in Carnoy's solution (6 : 3 : 1) and anthers were squashed in acetocamine. For each hybrid, pollen mother cells (PMCs) at MI were scored for chromosome configurations and these scores were averaged yielding a mean frequency per PMC for each configuration.

Genome symbols are those used by KIHARA (1982) except for U instead of Cu as proposed by CHENNAVEERAIAH (1960) and B instead of S as proposed by LOVE (1982). The distinctness of the karyotype of Ae. uniaristata Vis. from that of Ae. comosa Sibth. et Smith (M genome) was noted by CHENNAVEERAIAH (1960) and its genome was given the symbol L by LOVE (1982). This genome has been shown to be involved in the tetraploid species Ae. ventricosa Tausch by karyotype analysis (CHENNAVEERAIAH 1960), by synthesis of an amphiploid from a hybrid between Ae. tauschii Coss. and Ae. uniaristata which resembled Ae. ventricosa (MATSUMOTO et al. 1957), and by chromosome pairing in a hybrid between Ae. ventricosa and Ae. uniaristata (KIMBER et al. 1983). Thus DL will be used here for the genomes of Ae. ventricosa.

Results and Discussion


The use of MI chromosome pairing data from hybrids for the purpose of genome analysis must accommodate two considerations. One is that a certain extent of relatedness exists between the chromosomes of any two genomes as a result of their descent from a diploid ancestor common to all taxa in the Triticeae. In this descent, chromosomes become differentiated structurally and nonstructurally from their ancestral homologues. There is evidence that nonstructural differentiation, presumably at the nucleotide sequence level, is the most important cause of the pairing failure observed in hybrids within species and between species (DVORAK & MCGUIRE 1981 ; CROSSWAY & DVORAK 1984 ; DVORAK & CHEN 1984 ; KOTA et al. 1986). The other consideration is that most if not all polyploid Aegilops species possess an oppositional genetic system that regulates heterogenetic chromosome pairing to produce diploid-like, bivalent MI pairing in those species (MCGUIRE & DVORAK 1982).



--> Next


(go to KOMUGI Home) (go to WIS List) (go to NO.61-62 Contents)