|
Since all the three races are virulent on variety Lee
(Yr7) the segregation for this locus cannot be detected.
However, a segregation of one locus in the cross CPAN 1360 x
Lee against race 38A; of two loci in the cross Tobari 66 x
Lee against race 20A, in cross Sonalika x Lee against race
31; and in crosses CPAN 1444 x Lee and HD 2009 x Lee against
race 38A, and three loci in the crosses; in CPAN x Lee (for
races 20A and 31) and Tobari 66 x Lee (against race 20A)
suggested the presence of resistance genes other than Yr7 in
the corresponding parents.
In their crosses with Compair (Yr8), the varieties CPAN
1360, CPAN 1444, DH 2009 and Tenori 71 showed two to three
gene segregation indicating that genes other than Yr8 occur
in these varieties giving resistance to race 38A.
The Nudif TP 250 genes (Yr1+Yr6) are indicated to be present
in varieties CPAN 1444, Sonalika, HD 2009, Tanori 71 and
Tobari 66 on the similar assumptions made above.
A Iimitation in the present set of materials may be
attributed to the lack of information on the genetic nature
of variety Agra Local, the susceptible variety used in the
experiment. It was susceptible to the races used in the
present study but this cannot be taken as an evidence that
the variety is universal susceptible. Moreover, Lee (Yr7)
was also susceptible to the three races. Studies of SAWHNEY
& LUTHRA (1970) have already hinted at the resemblance
of reaction pattern of Agra Local with that of an
International differential variety for yellow rust (Michigan
Amber). The latter variety is suggested to carry Ya2 + Yr7
(Anonymous, 1979). So long as a parasite culture carrying a
matching virulent gene is not used, the capacity of the
resistance gene in Agra Local, if present, to confer
resistance will remain undiscovered and the particular
allele will segregate as recessive alleles for
susceptibility. This point gains favour from PERSON &
MAYO's (1974) explanation on the genetic limitations on
models for specific interactions.
Table 1. Seeedling reaction of
varieties with undetermined genes for resistance, tester
Yr-lines and F1 hybrids between varieties and
testers and Agra Local against races 20A, 31 and 38A of
Puccinia striiformis
Table 2. Segregation betaviour of
crosses between varieties with undetermined res-genes and
tester lines when tested at seedling stage in F2
against three races of P. striiformis
References
Anonymous 1979. European yellow rust-nursery. List of
varieties 1979 (Unpublished).
JAIN, R. & GANDHI, S.M. 1978. Genetics of stem rust
resistance in variety Timgalen. Indian J. Genet. 38:
252-257.
KOCHHAR, S., GILL, K.S. & NANDA, G.S. 1982. Genetic
analysis of some component lines of Kalyansona multilines of
bread wheat to three races of yellow rust. Indian J. Genet.
(In press).
LUPTON, F.G.H. & MACER, R.C.F. 1962. Inheritance of
resistance to yellow rust in seven varieties of wheat.
Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc, 45: 21-45.
SAWHNEY, R.N. & LUTHRA, J.K. 1970. New resistance genes
of wheat to Indian races of stripe rust (Puccina
struformis). SABRAO News Letter, 2: 155-156.
PERSON, C. & MAYO, G.M.E. 1974. Genetic limitations on
models of specific interaction between a host and its
parasite. Can. J. Bot. 52: 1339-1347.
|